I assume you're explaining why the Committee might choose to seed them

higher. I agree that would likely be the justification. However, they also have three Quadrant 2 losses.

It frustrates me that the Committee's approach rewards inconsistent performance. K State gets the benefit of its Q1 wins while there is little discussion of the Q2 losses. (If they didn't have the Q2 losses, they'd be rated higher than VT and we wouldn't be having this discussion.)

(In response to this post by Chris Coleman)

Posted: 03/11/2019 at 11:28AM

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

I assume you're explaining why the Committee might choose to seed them

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors