All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

Colonel Jessup

Joined: 12/28/1999 Posts: 11103
Likes: 1875


If it were profitable for ESPN and ACC it would have been done


ACC has to go behind the better product (SEC) and be aligned with the best time for carriage re-negotiations. The deals done and not done thus far for ACCN prove this point.

The only alternative was to buy out early from Raycom, not include Tier-3 in ESPN negotiation of higher tiers (how would have price been affected?), and pray some smaller operation could effectively sell the product and get widespread adoption of the network. With football being the driver and Tier-3 ACC games being low rated (ESPN would never release Clem/GT or even VT/BC to some other provider) how could it print money like everyone assume it would? I am willing to listen to counter arguments but it seems people are so anti-Swofford it clouds their thinking on this. Yes, Swofford hoodwinked the presidents (who have to approve all plans) out of millions because of his son. Right.

(In response to this post by NokieHokie)

Posted: 08/23/2019 at 12:09PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
SEC Network sign on much better than ACC -- VTMedic513 08/22/2019 12:44PM
  Thanks for the info. -- 2hhoop3 08/23/2019 8:04PM
  Thanks for the detail...... -- 2hhoop3 08/23/2019 10:23AM
  They can wait but any damage is being done now -- Colonel Jessup 08/23/2019 12:26PM
  Not really. Verizon FIOS is not a bit player -- gman86 08/22/2019 4:15PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307