Had not developed enough to be a starter next year. ship sailed ** -- 949hokie 05/03/2022 5:04PM GURU previously posted that he was a tremendous practice player this year -- HOKIESHARK 05/04/2022 08:05AMInsert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:
|
Current Thread:
|
Had not developed enough to be a starter next year. ship sailed ** -- 949hokie 05/03/2022 5:04PM GURU previously posted that he was a tremendous practice player this year -- HOKIESHARK 05/04/2022 08:05AM May not have been 100% his decision. Coaches influence. -- chagerma 05/03/2022 5:03PM I’m guessing it was his decision. He was being recruited over -- NC Hoke 05/03/2022 7:22PM I'd be surprised if he got pushed out given our shortage of bigs ** -- UpperQuad 05/03/2022 5:42PM Exactly, he might be best available if Mutts leaves and -- VTCC 65 05/03/2022 5:50PM I am sure CMY know more than we do and prob has better options ** -- 949hokie 05/03/2022 5:56PM Yep, always more to the story ** -- VaTechHokiesACC 05/03/2022 6:57PM BIG MAN on the Court? ** -- McHokie93 05/03/2022 4:32PM Big man on bench ** -- 949hokie 05/03/2022 5:07PM He would be 2nd guy off the bench ** -- soflahokie 05/03/2022 3:50PM He would have been starting 5 I think ** -- McHokie93 05/03/2022 4:31PM If he was the starter, than things would be worse that we thought. ** -- 949hokie 05/03/2022 5:06PM Certainly not if Mutts returns… looking at a similar 15-20 minute role -- HokieHoopzThe2nd 05/03/2022 4:45PM He would not have been BMOC ** -- NOFX 05/03/2022 3:28PMTech Sideline is Presented By:
Our Sponsors
