All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


Based on the current bylaws requiring divisions to play a round


robin schedule that would mean your proposal would have 7 division games and 2 permanent cross-division games every year.

(example purposes only)
Division AB: 7 division games, 1 cross-division game from Pod C and 1 cross-division game from Pod D (aka 2 permanent cross-division games from Division CD)

Would majority of the schools and/or their fans support it? Or would they prefer having 1 or 2 rotating cross-division games? I could see supporting 1 permanent cross-division game because most schools have more than 1 rival they would want to continue playing annually. However, if you go with 2 permanent cross-division games then I would think it would create an imbalance (similar to what we see now) with the number of times each team gets to play a high profile school. I mean there will be a certain level of imbalance when factoring in the "natural rivalries." For example Miami will always get to play FSU more than UVA or VT. However, if UVA or VT ended up in the same pod as Miami, then there would be an imbalance of at least 2 games (maybe more depending on the cycle) within the pod. Plus, if the ACC decide to permanently associate 1 pod to each division, then teams would never get to play the other 3 members of the pod because they will only play the protected member. Even if all 4 pods are rotated over a 6 year window, then teams may be looking at a "disadvantage" of 4 games instead of only 2 or 3. Then again I don't know how much of an impact that could have on a school.

(In response to this post by HOO86)

Posted: 05/04/2016 at 12:54PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  B12 is not a P5 league ** -- BigCrumpy 05/03/2016 1:59PM
  Seriously??? ** -- Tailgate Guru 05/03/2016 11:15PM
  B12 has a conundrum on their hands -- hokieone 05/03/2016 10:39AM
  B12 media deal is for 12 schools not 10 -- BigCrumpy 05/03/2016 2:01PM
  It's all about texas -- Mercury 05/03/2016 11:59AM
  Is the consultant telling them to steal from the ACC? ** -- Lakeridgehokie 05/03/2016 09:22AM
  I found the old Pac-10 the most enjoyable. -- Maroon Baboon 05/02/2016 9:14PM
  I found the PAC 12 unavailable on my TV -- BigCrumpy 05/03/2016 2:06PM
  But but but they have a network. **** -- Lead Dog 05/03/2016 7:45PM
  I wonder if the ACC and Big 12 are talking to each other. -- VT ChemE 1986 05/02/2016 8:31PM
  ACC has too many schools and they need 2... -- VictoryTurkey 05/03/2016 07:40AM
  If 2 teams are going to leave the ACC for the Big XII -- VTHokie2000 05/03/2016 11:48AM
  A problem with that is the Big Ten doesn't want Iowa St -- VTHokie2000 05/03/2016 2:29PM
  It could work if you have regional divisions. -- HOO86 05/03/2016 2:54PM
  Two 7 team divisions is worse. -- HOO86 05/03/2016 3:27PM
  That is one possible way of setting it up. -- HOO86 05/03/2016 4:50PM
  A similar scenario crossed my mind -- VTHokie2000 05/03/2016 5:56PM
  There will still be 2 divisions officially. -- HOO86 05/03/2016 10:21PM
  The most logical reason would be money -- VTHokie2000 05/03/2016 2:05PM
  Not necessarily true -- VTHokie2000 05/03/2016 2:12PM
  But the B12 has schools like Iowa State, and TCU -- BigCrumpy 05/03/2016 2:05PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307