In fact, I think that is was reasonable ad accurate. My different take is that Chew made the move primarily for long-term professional reasons, rather than the program challenges described in the article. When I read the article it seemed to infer that Chew was "running away" from something, which I don't believe is the case. I believe that he "moved forward" to the next step in his career. Different interpretations of the same facts lead to different conclusions.

Of course, I could be entirely wrong about my interpretation.