All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

HOO86

Joined: 12/12/2002 Posts: 21847
Likes: 2038

What's this?

Larry Scott claims that his way is better.


The PAC12 has total control. They assume all of the risk and cost, and thus they receive all of the reward.

But, the advantage of a major network is leverage with all of the infrastructure that the major network has as well as their industry clout to achieve distribution.

I think that the news of the article is that Larry Scott is full steam ahead with his approach for the PAC12.

(In response to this post by VTHokie2000)

Posted: 06/16/2016 at 8:16PM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  Larry Scott: "PAC-12N Optimal Model for US" -- HOO86 06/16/2016 5:06PM
  Adding 4 Big 12 schools would improve distribution.. -- Old Line Hokie 06/17/2016 11:15AM
  I think the PAC12 has a luxury that the ACC doesn't have... -- Mr. Touchdown 06/17/2016 10:46AM
  I see it very differently... -- jesuisvtguy 06/18/2016 05:00AM
  Tens of millions less people there and college sports are not as relevant. -- chuckd4vt 06/18/2016 01:34AM
  Love that model. It's ALREADY worth $800 million. -- chuckd4vt 06/16/2016 10:04PM
  Even though the Pac-12N model may not be generating as much revenue -- VTHokie2000 06/16/2016 5:56PM
  The weakness is they have no leverage in distribution and fees -- daveinop 06/17/2016 08:07AM
  But they're increasing it slowly but surely. And they aren't sharing profit -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:12PM
  Rinse, repeat** -- daveinop 06/17/2016 5:14PM
  Since no one knows what the future will be in terms of distribution -- VTHokie2000 06/17/2016 12:04PM
  Larry Scott claims that his way is better. -- HOO86 06/16/2016 8:16PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307