Texas has said the only way they'd get rid of LHN

is [if] they joined another conference.

With the struggles ESPN has had with that network there most likely is no LHN beyond the current deal, which isn't a great long term solution for [Texas].

So the question is: would Texas rather get into whatever other P5 conference they want and bring who they want or would they rather wait while milking ESPN for their LHN check and take the risk of filling an empty spot in a conference that isn't optimal for them?
[Post edited by hokieball at 07/24/2016 6:18PM]

In response to this post by Colonel Jessup

Posted: 07/24/2016 at 6:18PM

What's the poker axiom. "When you look around the table and can't -- manassashoo 07/23/2016 10:29AM

Big XII is dead man walking. Who of the three bolts first? -- DMaroonHokie 07/23/2016 2:38PM

I agree but I think KU goes with them to B1G ** -- moonda 07/25/2016 08:28AM

But does the B1X want KU? -- EDGEMAN 07/25/2016 09:17AM

KU brings basketball and...well, little else. ** -- marcbvtgm 07/25/2016 10:38PM

I think expansion comes first, then they leave... -- hokieball 07/23/2016 5:25PM

That quote was the same thing Maryland fans said.... -- Old Line Hokie 07/24/2016 12:19PM

So bascially dig up old Big East conference articles -- DarylS 07/23/2016 5:31PM

Yes. History repeats itself. -- hokieball 07/23/2016 5:44PM

LHN runs thru 2031 and they can't take it with them ** -- Colonel Jessup 07/24/2016 08:35AM

Texas has said the only way they'd get rid of LHN -- hokieball 07/24/2016 6:18PM

Every UT action thus far leads me to believe they will milk it -- Colonel Jessup 07/25/2016 09:48AM

I did not know that -- ahokie4u 07/24/2016 09:14AM

That is part of the fallout from the Big 12 GoR. it made -- daveinop 07/25/2016 10:37AM

Texas has said the only way they'd get rid of LHN

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors