I'm as anti-GoR and pro-loophole kind of guy as you'll find on this board.

I also think your thoughts are very interesting...far from impossible. I just think it is much easier after 2036 than before.

The GoRs don't really have conference-related loopholes once the "rights" are sold. All of the GoR's are for the purpose of fulfilling specific media contracts. That is the reason they exist. It is why the signature of each school is on the document.

If you and your family members sell me a right of way for 99 years, it's mine for the duration of the terms of the sale, no matter whether your family disbands or not. Your sister can't un-sign scot-free just because she wants to let her new commune friends camp out there.

The ACC could unanimously vote to kill their GoR tomorrow but ESPN/Raycom still would own broadcast rights for every home game for every signatory to the prior GoR in every sport through 2036. Could they be persuaded to alter the terms? For the right price, perhaps. So if that is your point, then I can see it.

In response to this post by VTHokie2000

Posted: 01/05/2017 at 6:12PM

Greg Sankey says G5 should be careful about playoff idea. -- HOO86 01/02/2017 10:55PM

It is very clear that over the long haul, the G5 conferences -- seekoHoG 01/06/2017 12:32PM

The problem will be solved when the playoffs expand to 8 -- I85Hokie 01/04/2017 12:49PM

The most likely 8 CFP teams is thru 4 CCGs. ** -- East Cobb Hokie 01/04/2017 3:15PM

Only if the power conferences force Notre Dame to join a conference -- VTHokie2000 01/04/2017 5:48PM

ND will either be in the ACC or out of "P" football status long before 2036 -- daveinop 01/04/2017 7:26PM

You are assuming the competition among the power conferences -- VTHokie2000 01/05/2017 09:32AM

I'm only addressing the ND comment. FWIW, the conferences can't dissolve -- daveinop 01/05/2017 3:06PM

If the power conferences decide to break away before the GoRs -- VTHokie2000 01/05/2017 4:15PM

I'm as anti-GoR and pro-loophole kind of guy as you'll find on this board. -- daveinop 01/05/2017 6:12PM

If the ACC doesn't exist anymore, then does the GoR still apply? -- VTHokie2000 01/06/2017 08:47AM

Yes; to whatever extent the GOR references a specific TV contract and the -- daveinop 01/11/2017 9:01PM

Actually you misunderstood my scenario because you appear -- VTHokie2000 01/13/2017 4:34PM

Isn't the entire system already broken and the "bone" the G5s get -- VTHokie2000 01/03/2017 1:57PM

I think it works better right now than it has ever worked. -- HOO86 01/03/2017 5:07PM

Now that college is paying...errr giving student-athletes a stipend -- VTHokie2000 01/04/2017 10:30AM

It could very well work toward separation. -- HOO86 01/04/2017 10:46AM

Something to consider (if there is a formal separation between the groups) -- VTHokie2000 01/04/2017 11:47AM

Possibly. What prevents that is the competition between ESPN and Fox. -- HOO86 01/04/2017 2:24PM

80 is feasible assuming the P5s don't end up going the all sports -- VTHokie2000 01/04/2017 5:42PM

Re: 80 is feasible assuming the P5s don't end up going the all sports -- 33laszlo99 01/05/2017 12:27AM

Remember I do say it is contingent on a couple of things. -- VTHokie2000 01/05/2017 09:40AM

I'm as anti-GoR and pro-loophole kind of guy as you'll find on this board.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors