All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

daveinop

Joined: 04/10/2003 Posts: 8165
Likes: 518


Being 2nd or 3rd in every computer rank is certainly what they had going


If one is going to say they were "unequivocally" top 4, then that's the heart of the argument.

However, those same computers had OSU and Washington solidly ahead of Clemson. Clemson, in fact, wasn't even in the in the top 4 in 9 of the 15 computer rankings used in the Massey composite.

The committee however, had Clemson second. So either they use the computers or they don't. I think the Committee got caught up in Meyer/Harbaugh mania.

(In response to this post by Colonel Jessup)

Posted: 01/09/2017 at 11:04AM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Tony Barnhart gets interview with Bill Hancock -- HOO86 01/07/2017 4:44PM
  Schedules were not comparable. OSU>UW ** -- chuckd4vt 01/09/2017 10:31AM
  OSU=B1G East Co-runner up. -- Maroon Baboon 01/09/2017 2:53PM
  Ohio State was 2nd in composite computer ranking -- Colonel Jessup 01/08/2017 4:22PM
  Pretty sure Vegas had OSU pegged as 2nd. -- chuckd4vt 01/10/2017 10:53AM
  They did follow their own protocol. ** -- reestuart 01/10/2017 5:57PM
  Ummm...selectively...perhaps. -- daveinop 01/13/2017 4:45PM
  Guess the B10 was extremely overrated. ** -- EDGEMAN 01/10/2017 4:54PM
  You broke our agreement ** -- daveinop 01/10/2017 1:29PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307