All Hokie, All the Time. Period.

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 1/1/05 Posts: 9763
Likes: 1354


If VT and UVA are not in the same pod, which is likely


for a couple of different reasons, then there is always the possibility that VT's pod and UVA's pod may not be paired together. Given how important access to the southeast states for recruiting purposes is (among other reasons), then it is unlikely there will be enough schools to support quads being broken out like this:

Quad 1: BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Notre Dame/UConn
Quad 2: Louisville, UVA, VT, WVU/Notre Dame/Navy
Quad 3: Duke, Wake, UNC, NC State
Quad 4: Clemson, GT, FSU, Miami

I do agree that the 4 NC schools are the most likely candidates to be upset with majority of the suggestions, but I wouldn't completely rule out a non-NC school being more upset because it may depend on whether the ACC has 2 quads with 2 NC schools or 4 quads with 1 NC school. Personally, I think the ACC will lean towards the 4 quads with 1 NC school option because it will make it easier to ensure that each quad has 1 school from Quad 4 in the above example.

One reason I asked whether you would be okay with not playing UVA every year is because I could see a scenario where ESPN wants certain quads paired together so the football schools play each other more frequently and help increase the quality of content. So it is possible that ESPN/ACC decide that balancing out the quads with the "football" schools is more important than the UVA-VT rivalry in football. The quads could end up looking something like this (assume 1-2 and 3-4 are paired together):

Quad 1: FSU, Duke, Louisville, Syracuse
Quad 2: Miami, UNC, UVA, BC
Quad 3: Clemson, NC State, WVU, Pitt
Quad 4: GT, Wake, VT, Notre Dame

In this scenario each quad has 2 quality football schools (FSU, Louisville, Miami, UNC, Clemson, WVU, VT, and Notre Dame). Also, each quad would have 1 historically bad program (Syracuse, UVA, NC State/Pitt, and Wake). It is also possible that the UVA-VT annual rivalry may be sacrificed so 1 quad doesn't end up with 3 quality "football" programs (i.e. Clemson, Louisville, Miami).

(In response to this post by Old Line Hokie)

Posted: 03/03/2017 at 10:42PM



+0
Current Thread:
  There should be 1 conference. Not 4 -- 4x4hokies 03/03/2017 6:58PM
  I don't think having 4 divisions within a conference will.. -- Old Line Hokie 03/03/2017 12:32PM
  Re: Depends on what you mean by -- Old Line Hokie 03/03/2017 7:03PM
  If VT and UVA are not in the same pod, which is likely -- VTHokie2000 03/03/2017 10:42PM
  Test -- PhotoHokieNC 03/12/2017 10:36AM
  You lost me at Uconn and Navy ** -- Byting Gobbler 03/04/2017 08:42AM
  Right now Notre Dame is the 15th member and could be -- VTHokie2000 03/04/2017 4:44PM
  I wonder what he means by "very, very large" -- OU_Sooner 03/03/2017 12:01AM
  One big question is will Stanford and UCLA -- goldendomer 03/03/2017 09:00AM
  Re: I wonder what he means by -- Stech 03/03/2017 08:04AM
  Agreed -- OU_Sooner 03/03/2017 10:15AM
  Re: I wonder what he means by -- SoCloseHokie 03/03/2017 08:13AM
  An intriguing idea -- OU_Sooner 03/03/2017 10:10AM
  Re: An intriguing idea -- HOO86 03/03/2017 12:25PM
  Re: An intriguing idea -- SoCloseHokie 03/03/2017 10:52AM

Support TSL by Shopping at Amazon


Our Sponsors






vs314