All Hokie, All the Time. Period.

Conference Realignment Board

hokie-c

Joined: 8/19/03 Posts: 501
Likes: 152


I can't refute what you say about wanting "name" schools


in each division, but I don't believe the school presidents think about it that way. I think the people who actually make these decisions see themselves as all generally equal institutions and that other considerations carry more weight. I think, at least in the ACC, the decision makers would consider regional proximity and travel distances as well as traditional rivalries. That would put VT in the North with the old BE schools. That's why I worry about "getting what we ask for" in realignment. All I really want is to play everyone more frequently. If pods does it, then I'm OK with that. If rotating Divisional membership accomplishes it, I'm OK with that too. If the best we can do is eliminate the cross-over rival, then I can live with that. Just don't fill our schedule with BC, Syr., Pitt, UVA, etc. to the exclusion of the southern football schools.

(In response to this post by VTHokie2000)

Posted: 07/16/2017 at 08:24AM



+0
Current Thread:
 
  
WFNZ in Charlotte is at the ACC meeting -- Victor Tango 07/13/2017 11:07AM
  Pods ** -- daveinop 07/15/2017 08:51AM
  This realignment seems unrealistic. -- hokie-c 07/14/2017 10:09AM
  Re: WFNZ in Charlotte is at the ACC meeting -- Millpoint 07/13/2017 2:52PM
  Like groundhog day. Same topic, new "reporter". ** -- goldendomer 07/13/2017 2:01PM
  If/when UT jouns another conference it -- 133193Hokie 07/13/2017 12:40PM
  Swofford comments -- TerryD 07/13/2017 11:30AM
  More -- TerryD 07/13/2017 12:40PM
  "Unless", you mean....not "until" :) ** -- TerryD 07/13/2017 12:59PM
  Good one. :-) ** -- Stech 07/14/2017 07:11AM

Support TSL by Shopping at Amazon


Our Sponsors







vm312