All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

goldendomer

Joined: 01/04/2001 Posts: 2799
Likes: 1183

What's this?

They will wait forever than 20 years after forever.


That is not because they need us, it is because of bad contracts and deals made. If they try to get out and demand something from us in 2036, I bet we leave and move somewhere else. By than we maybe just in tatters and be okay with the Big East. The ACC missed there chance and fell for the bluff in negotiation, we would have never joined the Big 12. Swofford failed.

(In response to this post by Millpoint)

Posted: 07/18/2017 at 07:49AM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- HOO86 07/17/2017 11:48AM
  Re: Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- Millpoint 07/17/2017 3:19PM
  They will wait forever than 20 years after forever. -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 07:49AM
  Re: They will wait forever than 20 years after forever. -- Vippie1 07/18/2017 11:16AM
  Think Domer was referencing the CFP, not ACC -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 12:57PM
  Concur on both sides being happy with the current arrangement -- EDGEMAN 07/18/2017 11:40AM
  Re: Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- Millpoint 07/17/2017 3:17PM
  Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them. -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:21AM
  The status quo works for me just fine -- TerryD 07/18/2017 07:44AM
  ACCdoes not need us now, the ACC made a overall poor deal. -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 07:38AM
  I think both sides made a good deal -- TerryD 07/18/2017 11:53AM
  Two football national Champs in 3 years is pretty good & other ND sports -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:58AM
  If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 08:24AM
  It was a great deal for the ACC - not sure why you disagree -- lawhokie 07/18/2017 9:25PM
  Re: If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 11:36AM
  We disagree today, we will always disagree on this... -- TerryD 07/18/2017 11:39AM
  Re: We disagree today, we will always disagree on this... -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 1:05PM
  Re: Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them. -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 07:30AM
  ND would only have to decide path if they had a 12-0 or 11-1 year, -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 1:09PM
  Your logic is right -- RTFC 07/19/2017 1:13PM
  Your second paragraph is most likely ** -- TerryD 07/20/2017 11:17AM
  Re: ND would only have to decide path if they had a 12-0 or 11-1 year, -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 1:47PM
  Swofford may. I don't know that it's a good idea. -- HOO86 07/17/2017 3:20PM
  I'm still waiting for Wake to pay their $25,000 fine. -- Old Line Hokie 07/17/2017 2:25PM
  So no one's coming to the ACC...unless they do. :-) -- Stech 07/17/2017 12:14PM
  Disagree. -- East Cobb Hokie 07/17/2017 2:29PM
  You disagree that Swofford won't say anything until ink is dry? That 's my -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:10AM
  Excuse my futile attempt at humor -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 1:00PM
  Even when the ink is dry, Swofford may still wait to make -- VTHokie2000 07/18/2017 10:52AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307