All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


In terms of "financially worth taking," couldn't a case be made


that several schools already taken don't exactly fit that profile? The ones I am thinking about are Rutgers, BC, and maybe Mizzou. Although I could see someone make a case for Pitt and Syracuse to be included in the "maybe" category with Mizzou. If conferences are willing to add schools that may not be "financially worth taking," then who is to say they won't do it again in the future?

(In response to this post by Late 80s Hokie)

Posted: 09/20/2017 at 1:38PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Swofford interview at BC-ND game. -- HOO86 09/18/2017 5:24PM
  I would not recommend that the ACC wait on ND ** -- TerryD 09/19/2017 11:45AM
  Yes,14 is already unwieldy. ** -- hokie-c 09/19/2017 10:57PM
  Concur, we probably have too many now. -- EDGEMAN 09/18/2017 9:50PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307