All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

TD-Tech

Joined: 09/08/2002 Posts: 7091
Likes: 722

What's this?

Potential with that - in the little reading I did, the...


I-400 seemed hard to maneuver and susceptible to attack..... and the payload they could deliver with just 2 planes doesn't seem much, for all the trouble....or just seems that way to me. Of course, now , launching tomahawks from subs does the same and more, of what the I-400 could do, without the hassle ....

(In response to this post by HokieDan95)

Posted: 10/23/2017 at 2:40PM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  Ww2 peeps: why was the potential of the cv ignored in favor of battleships? -- HokieDan95 10/22/2017 10:08PM
  That, and the London Naval Treaty. -- Chris Coleman  10/23/2017 12:41PM
  My dad,a sub engineer, said to put $ in subs vs carriers.... -- TD-Tech 10/23/2017 11:54AM
  Thought the Japanese I400 was an interesting idea -- HokieDan95 10/23/2017 1:54PM
  We had three fleet carriers in the Pacific when the war started. -- hokieman842 10/23/2017 09:39AM
  Battleships were old hat by the time of WW1 -- I85Hokie 10/23/2017 07:37AM
  People are resistant to change -- Vienna_Hokie 10/22/2017 10:28PM
  The US already had battleships. It wasn't like you could build a bunch of -- Hokie`79 10/22/2017 10:25PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307