All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

fordham

Joined: 07/21/2015 Posts: 14796
Likes: 6441

What's this?

I am with the building owner, yes he allowed it but unless there was


a contract he could do what he wanted with it. And the building was going to be bulldozed anyways. Bad ruling by the judge. The artists should have bought the building if they actually wanted to save the art

(In response to this post by DonHo-kieHi)

Posted: 02/13/2018 at 4:15PM


+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  What say you Lounge Jurors. "Landowners Rights" or "Out of Control Judge" -- DonHo-kieHi 02/13/2018 2:15PM
  A diffetent angle. Think "adverse possession". -- 48zip 02/13/2018 8:46PM
  I'm almost always on the side of Property Rights. If you're going to deface -- Hokie CPA 02/13/2018 8:30PM
  I am with the building owner, yes he allowed it but unless there was -- fordham 02/13/2018 4:15PM
  One thing the guy could've done... -- Hokie CPA 02/13/2018 8:33PM
  The art was left on his property. It was his to do with as he pleased. ** -- El Paso Hokie 02/13/2018 3:22PM
  Screw that ... graffiti artist should b paying for the white paint ** -- 83Hokie 02/13/2018 3:13PM
  Uncharted waters require massive funds for legal fees & lawyers love it! ** -- grill to chill 02/13/2018 3:04PM
  Once the owner allowed it, he was doomed. OTOH, if it sold for $200,000,000 -- 48zip 02/13/2018 2:31PM
  Yeah, that was a poor decision by the owner... -- MP4VT2004 02/13/2018 3:43PM
  Speaking of Red-cockaded woodpeckers... -- EDGEMAN 02/13/2018 2:30PM
  I say it will be overturned - what defines art ** -- bigbadbird 02/13/2018 2:28PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307