...and that conference championships are so much more objective...and yet, he/she proposes a playoff that is limited to the P5. Isn't that a subjective (one might say "arbitrary") line in the sand? It strikes me as an "eye test" or subjective judgment that P5 is better than G5. That P5 champs are more worthy than G5 champs. I was hoping vtox would explain why that isn't just a form of subjective/arbitrary decision-making that he/she claims to be trying to avoid.