I would say the vision of those who think we can be Clemson and want to follow their lead have no following over there. So even if we could make a lot of progress doing it like Clemson, we won't.
We aren't cutting more politically correct non revs for football. We just aren't especially under someone like Sands.

I think there is a view (and not an all incorrect view) that football especially that sucks up so many resources and it so gender discriminatory, exist to fund not only itself but a large part of the athletic budget. If it does not do that, then there isn't much support for football.