Laaser asked an open ended question about re-visiting decisions
And Fu answered. I thought after a couple days he sounded much more like he was taking responsibility. “If decisions we make don’t work, then they were wrong”
Revisiting those plays and how your line of thinking goes or should’ve gone is a growth process. He’s only been a P5 coach a little over a year and a half.
Gambling/going on 4th in analytics sense is a way to produce more TD scoring opportunities. Problem is GT games call for different analytics, and I believe he overthought some things. Aggressiveness for the sake of being aggressive when your personnel doesn’t lend itself to being successful doesn’t work
I think he’s just fine. I also think people are underestimating how good GT is (they played their own stinker of the year at UVA). They easily could be 8-1, easily...3 games lost on literally one play in each
|
(
In response to this post by Polito1)
Posted: 11/14/2017 at 09:38AM