Why is that UT only if it is from a state fund

with money that is earned from state owned land? Why wouldn’t something like this be rolled out to all state colleges?

I’m asking out of ignorance on this. I’d understand if it was all from wealthy alum donors. But the state fund aspect throws me off.

In response to this post by DJ Golf

Posted: 07/09/2019 at 9:35PM

UT Austin: free rides for in-state undergrads whose families earn < $65K -- DJ Golf 07/09/2019 9:28PM

University of Richmond is already doing that. ** -- ElbertoHokie 07/10/2019 09:27AM

NOt sure why free college freaks out a certain group. I see no society -- UTPr0sim 07/09/2019 10:02PM

Its because some of us understand how money works and can do math. ** -- HokieNoVA 07/10/2019 10:50AM

Seems to be fewer and fewer of us by the day, though. ** -- Tafkam Hokie 07/10/2019 12:32PM

They'd prefer poor people remain poor and uneducated. ** -- VTSnake 07/10/2019 08:49AM

Read up on what happened when LA did it ** -- Vienna_Hokie 07/09/2019 11:14PM

UCLA? Louisiana? Latin America? Links? ** -- HWA 07/10/2019 09:22AM

Nothing is free. Someone pays for it. ** -- GreenvilleVT 07/09/2019 10:26PM

It's not the free education as much as risk of an uncontrolled government -- Hokie360 07/09/2019 10:13PM

Why is that UT only if it is from a state fund -- HokieAl 07/09/2019 9:35PM

It's more of an university controlled endowment, not state controlled fund. -- Hokie360 07/09/2019 10:03PM

Why is that UT only if it is from a state fund

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors