WW2 peeps: ...does this mean what it seems to, MEAN?

Doug' had W.M.D.'s in the, Philippines?

If "si", should he have used them on the japs?
You are getting beat. Does this buy some time? Fight fire with fire?
Maybe you can rescue mission/free some peeps up on a last-minute transport run.
----------
If you use them on the japs, what (extremely notorious-- tho' STILL unknown in 1941)
Unit-731 comes back at you for it? Is this a good WWI style risk?
================
So if you are Gen.big.Mac' and you have chemical and biological weapons,
do you use them on the advancing and basically savage/murderous japs? Or, not?

why/why not?

TIA!
b.street

Posted: 07/16/2019 at 4:10PM

WW2 peeps: ...does this mean what it seems to, MEAN? -- bourbonstreet 07/16/2019 4:10PM

Just imagine if he'd had weaponized ticks ** -- MP4VT2004 07/16/2019 7:07PM

I don't think a "Chemical Warfare" term necessarily means WMD. -- Hokie360 07/16/2019 4:32PM

...I'm wondering if that was leftover WWI gizmos? Unless it meant chemical -- bourbonstreet 07/16/2019 4:35PM

Something more mundane and not digestible ... ??? -- PhotoHokieNC 07/16/2019 4:53PM

...paint mixers? Diff' engine cleaners? who knows??? ** -- bourbonstreet 07/16/2019 5:00PM

Guessing "Meat & Beans" was most toxic to Japanese pilots -- PhotoHokieNC 07/16/2019 5:22PM

Um, I don’t think that term is acceptable anymore -- HokieAl 07/16/2019 4:21PM

WW2 peeps: ...does this mean what it seems to, MEAN?

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors