Yeah that does seem off. Even if they meant 650 "outbreaks" which would

consist of multiple cases I still don't think that that would be a "major source". I would also think that many people who test positive don't know where they got it from and thus a "source" can't be determined.

(In response to this post by HokieGator)

Posted: 07/08/2020 at 2:35PM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

Is it just me or does this (C19) headline not match the data in the story? -- HokieGator 07/08/2020 2:04PM

"Snakes. It had to be snakes. Asps. Very dangerous. You go first." ** -- TomTurkey 07/08/2020 3:41PM

Gotta keep them axes grinding. ** -- PhotoHokieNC 07/08/2020 3:18PM

Hype sells the paper, gets clicks. ** -- ColoVT82 07/08/2020 2:39PM

Yeah that does seem off. Even if they meant 650 "outbreaks" which would -- AbsolutVT03 07/08/2020 2:35PM

That is just a little over 5 per day once you break it down. If 5 is a -- Alan11 07/08/2020 2:15PM

Yeah that does seem off. Even if they meant 650 "outbreaks" which would

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors