...but you're suggesting that people who don't hold advanced degrees can't be informed about vaccines/virology and should listen to you - an educated guy on the internet - instead of listening to other educated people on the internet who may hold a different opinion. I know you said you're drunk posting, so I am sure that is playing a role here, but is that really the message you were trying to convey?

I respect everyone's opinion on this matter and don't think it's any of my business to tell anyone else what medical decisions they should/should not make, but the truth is that there are a lot of very respected medical professionals who are openly voicing concerns about mass vaccination for COVID, particularly among children. I don't know who is correct, but this isn't some black-and-white debate where there is "settled science", and I'm sure you and I could both cite multiple studies to support opposing viewpoints. There is still a lot of unknown, and I think it's wise for all of us to remain humble and not claim to know all there is to know about how these vaccines perform long-term. I'm all for open debate, and I appreciate getting perspectives that I may not necessarily agree with - but I just don't think suggesting other people are less informed is constructive. It's OK to simply agree to disagree.