All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

PhotoHokieNC

Joined: 12/28/2002 Posts: 143028
Likes: 33187

What's this?

When devoid of factual arguments, make sure you attack, right?


I chose to discuss, you chose to insult. Why you the devil are you "Moderate" (if you're so keen on reality)? You're not moderate at all. At least I'm a photographer and I live in NC.

The reality of the SC decision is that it confirms the knowledge anyone with a brain had that OSHA didn't have the authority to enforce the vaxx mandate and they certainly didn't have the bandwidth to implement it.

- and the SC said:
"Although COVID-19 is a risk that occurs in many workplaces, it is not an occupational hazard in most," the Court ruled. "COVID–19 can and does spread at home, in schools, during sporting events, and everywhere else that people gather. That kind of universal risk is no different from the day-to-day dangers that all face from crime, air pollution, or any number of communicable diseases."




[Post edited by PhotoHokieNC at 01/13/2022 4:00PM]

(In response to this post by ModerateHokie)

Posted: 01/13/2022 at 3:58PM


+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  No more OSHA vax mandates for private companies. SC upholds lower court -- vt90 01/13/2022 2:54PM
  You missed the part that health care do have to follow the mandate. ** -- UTPr0sim 01/13/2022 8:57PM
  Different mandate. Not OSHA ** -- ModerateHokie 01/14/2022 10:05AM
  Looks like my wife will lose her job. ** -- MP4VT2004 01/13/2022 9:13PM
  Thnkx for the update. ** -- ColoVT82 01/13/2022 3:46PM
  The mandate would have exacerbated the supply chain crunch. Logically or -- RoswellGAHokie 01/13/2022 3:04PM
  Maybe, but that's all irrelevant to the decision. ** -- ModerateHokie 01/13/2022 3:47PM
  You think the SC doesn't consider all the factors that result from -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 4:00PM
  Not that they don't consider, it's that they just don't care ** -- typed by ben 01/14/2022 06:11AM
  The majority on this decision, no. It's not their role. Read the decision ** -- ModerateHokie 01/13/2022 4:03PM
  It said OSHA has never undertaken similar - they used logic -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 4:13PM
  They don't care what impact the rule would have on test supply... -- ModerateHokie 01/13/2022 4:18PM
  And there is a difference between checking roof bolts and vaccine cards? ** -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 4:25PM
  Dude, you are making no sense. Stay out of the legal pool ** -- ModerateHokie 01/13/2022 4:44PM
  Ok- learn what Osha does ** -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 4:46PM
  Ok- ** -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 4:07PM
  Never said it was. ** -- RoswellGAHokie 01/13/2022 3:55PM
  It is, however, fully relevant to reality. ** -- PhotoHokieNC 01/13/2022 3:51PM
  Compulsive exacerbating ** -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 3:05PM
  Be careful...you'll put an eye out doing that! ** -- vthokieq 01/13/2022 3:17PM
  You go blind....but I hear you keep the eye -- Vippie1 01/13/2022 3:22PM
  Also hairy palms. ** -- HokieNoVA 01/13/2022 4:06PM
  Legal precedent had been with the states and municipalities' -- lchoro 01/13/2022 3:03PM
  No difference in making people get flu shots -- bigbadbird 01/13/2022 2:55PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors







vm307