He was a much more complete player his first year here

He was surrounded by 4 really good players at Wofford. Goose is not a developmental player either but he is definitely developing. If mutts wasn’t here DNG would give us similar numbers as what Keve gave Wofford IMO

In response to this post by soflahokie

Posted: 01/14/2022 at 3:26PM

Tech big men -- StautonHokie 01/14/2022 10:58AM

Took Aluma 3 years to really develop. Kidd is a Fr. Big John lost -- millmtnhokie 01/14/2022 12:49PM

Kidd has a long long long way to go. I don't see him -- VTMONEY94 01/14/2022 4:26PM

Yeah. Haynes may have more potential but both are a ways off ** -- millmtnhokie 01/14/2022 4:34PM

Big ways off ** -- DCL 01/14/2022 7:56PM

Aluma was a big contributer on Wofford's tournament team ** -- soflahokie 01/14/2022 2:56PM

He played well. Cameron Jackson was their best big -- millmtnhokie 01/14/2022 3:08PM

Aluma started every game, yes Jackson was a better player -- soflahokie 01/14/2022 3:13PM

He was a much more complete player his first year here -- millmtnhokie 01/14/2022 3:26PM

I think we should have put John in the game with Keve when... -- EDGEMAN 01/14/2022 11:47AM

Big men develop slower than wings/guards at all schools ** -- GCHokie34 01/14/2022 11:42AM

I hope our wing/ guards develop faster.. we need those next year also 😬 ** -- VermontDDS 01/15/2022 05:57AM

You'd think practicing against Aluma every day would make you better ** -- soflahokie 01/14/2022 11:15AM

Needs to "skill up" bigtime which is a good bit different than -- catdaddy 01/14/2022 2:23PM

He was a much more complete player his first year here

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors