...change anything from my perspective. The samples tested are relics, collected by people who want to believe in the yeti's existence. When they find hair or scat in the woods, they collect it as "proof" that the yeti is real. There was really no scientific method used to collect those samples originally. The fact that the DNA from several dozen samples from around the world match known species does not disprove the existence of an suspected, but yet unknown, species. I have seen some pretty convincing video footage of biped creatures that look too large and too smooth to be a human in a suit or a bear walking on its hind legs. Until I see a video of someone that filmed such a creature, tracked it, caught up to it, and proved it was a known species....I will be open-minded to the possibile existence of an unknown species of large, bipedal primates. Or, if respected anthropologist and professor Dr. Jeff Meldrum of Idaho St. changes his stance and says that Bigfoot does absolutely not exist, then I will be convinced of the same.