TechSideline.com

1. "how did we"

I'm not sure what you expect to hear there...we tried to be an attractive destination and succeeded.

2. what it says about the state of the program is that we were better off taking those guys in than not...the conclusion about fielding a "competitive team" is laughable.

In response to this post by HokieJay

Posted: 03/11/2019 at 5:16PM

(Edited) Re: Transfers, I'm sure this was discussed previously but.. -- HokieJay 03/11/2019 12:37PM

Actually 4 transfers...Blees was also ** -- Palmetto Hokie 03/11/2019 8:42PM

1. "how did we" -- Pylons 03/11/2019 5:16PM

2nd question would be very pessimistic perspective -- MExpos27 03/11/2019 1:33PM

Good input, I didn't know that. ** -- HokieJay 03/11/2019 1:59PM

"needed" them to field a competitive team??? -- AirborneHokie96 03/11/2019 1:25PM

2nd Question is a bogus assumption. -- Chris Taylor 03/11/2019 1:10PM

IMO, we had capability in the wings but limited, at best. -- wasris 03/11/2019 1:24PM

That was what I was trying to say... -- HokieJay 03/11/2019 1:58PM

When you have 9.9 scholarships to spread to 10 weight classes -- AirborneHokie96 03/11/2019 2:57PM

96--can you finish this statement from the past??? -- wasris 03/11/2019 3:13PM

I can't -- AirborneHokie96 03/11/2019 3:47PM

Before your time but inspired by your logon name -- wasris 03/11/2019 3:53PM

To be more accurate -- AirborneHokie96 03/11/2019 3:57PM

Yep, 9.9 is beyond pretty STRICT. ** -- wasris 03/11/2019 3:00PM

Thoughts .... -- hokietony 03/11/2019 12:49PM

Re Dunn -- vtdadingf 03/12/2019 1:46PM

Edinboro, true transfer, Myers, grad., Miller. Sleigh, grad., Bucknell!!** -- wasris 03/11/2019 12:48PM

Edinboro lost a lot actually (not just 2 to VT) -- MartyE 03/11/2019 7:57PM

1. "how did we"

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors