When the current set up was approved by all conferences, the P5 kept the
option of breaking away from the NCAA and leaving the G5 with nothing on the table, and had they not gotten what they wanted, the P5 would have broken away. Thus the G5 had to accept what the P5 was offering or get left behind.
As such, the G5 accepted 1 Mil per school for the right to be selected in the G5 access bowl and little chance that they would make it to the top 4. Remember UCF the first year they were undefeated were 12th in the polls before the bowls.
I don't see the P5 playing hard ball again against the G5 this time because the G5 rep has done extremely well against elite P5 teams in the Access bowl. As a matter of fact, the first year UCF was undefeated they beat an Auburn team that beat both UGA and Alabama, the 2 teams playing in the CFP championship game. So, UCF's National Championship was really as valid as any G5 National Championship could have been.
That being said, I think the current proposal of 5 P5 champs, 1 G5 rep and 2 at large is pretty generous to the G5. I remember Cincinnati got to 3rd in the BCS rankings the year they went undefeated until they played a Senior Tim Tebow lead Florida team in the access bowl. And I think TCU once got to 4th in the BCS rankings as an MWC member but those were in the days of a computer poll and I don't think we'll be going back to that.
[Post edited by ChrisLords at 12/16/2019 01:13AM]
|
(
In response to this post by Maroon Baboon)
Posted: 12/16/2019 at 01:13AM