Coach protest the calls and be ejected and then manage to get himself ejected thereafter on something that you say had absolutely no merit. This when the game is still in doubt. Seems that arguing over the issue to the point of getting a second coach ejected was counterproductive to wanting to win at that time. I’m thinking that perhaps our coaches may have had legitimate concern with the the rule as applied in the context of the game. I’d like to get our Coaches’s explanation of the rule and it’s application to the game.