All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

ren_hoek

Joined: 01/15/2014 Posts: 273
Likes: 126

What's this?

20 is too many for basketball


ND isn't joining so we'd have 20 for football and 21 for basketball. That would mean 20 game round robin for basketball. We're just now expanding the schedule to 20 games and we'd have to go to 22 to preserve a few vital home and home rivalries like Duke - UNC. That could put enough losses on half the teams to miss the tournament. Better idea is add Texas and either Houston or TCU as full members to get to 16/17.

(In response to this post by HOO86)

Posted: 09/07/2016 at 07:08AM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  Last night's UT/ND game huge for ACC IMO -- ScottyHeel 09/05/2016 09:08AM
  Austin is a grate place. ** -- Guy LeDouche 09/12/2016 5:49PM
  They MIGHT go independant and partial member football. -- chuckd4vt 09/06/2016 12:13AM
  Don't see the ACC taking another partial -- ren_hoek 09/06/2016 06:48AM
  I pray that you are wrong ** -- BigCrumpy 09/08/2016 3:04PM
  I don't think 20 is much different that 16. -- HOO86 09/06/2016 4:22PM
  So far that has been proven as an unstable alliance ** -- BigCrumpy 09/09/2016 1:40PM
  20 is too many for basketball -- ren_hoek 09/07/2016 07:08AM
  IMO, 20 will not happen without ND As full member. ** -- seekoHoG 09/07/2016 09:30AM
  Probaby but the fact is -- BigCrumpy 09/08/2016 3:08PM
  How stable would that mega conference be though? The thing -- VTHokie2000 09/08/2016 9:36PM
  Based off history Mega conferences worry me -- BigCrumpy 09/09/2016 1:39PM
  I would think 16 is probably as large as a conference can get -- VTHokie2000 09/09/2016 5:27PM
  What you are saying makes sense ** -- BigCrumpy 09/11/2016 4:40PM
  If a conference is going to expand beyond 16 members -- VTHokie2000 09/11/2016 6:11PM
  A 16 member conference still allows for 2 cross-division games -- VTHokie2000 09/06/2016 5:12PM
  Divisions change every year. -- HOO86 09/06/2016 5:41PM
  It's probably more about working around the LHN than partial membership. -- Stech 09/05/2016 6:33PM
  The other thing Scotty... -- Stech 09/05/2016 6:36PM
  That game was good for Texas. I don't think they were thinking... -- Calamitous 09/05/2016 3:24PM
  No more partial memberships! -- EDGEMAN 09/05/2016 11:32AM
  PSU? Better start looking into WVU or UCONN... -- lawhokie 09/05/2016 6:29PM
  100 "Likes" to that. Okay.. just 1. ** -- Old Line Hokie 09/05/2016 6:17PM
  If this game is played in the middle of the season... -- Maroon Baboon 09/05/2016 11:26AM
  I hope we don't offer UT a partial membership. -- Mr. Touchdown 09/05/2016 09:25AM
  If UT wants partial membership, and the ACC declines -- lawhokie 09/05/2016 6:24PM
  And what happened to Marcellus Wallace in the end? Excuse the pun. ** -- CrystalCoveHokie 09/06/2016 5:14PM
  My objection to partial membership isn't based on pride... -- Old Line Hokie 09/06/2016 10:54AM
  The Maryland debacle proved full membership does not = commitment -- lawhokie 09/07/2016 08:44AM
  Maryland was fully committed to the ACC for 50 years until -- Old Line Hokie 09/07/2016 1:37PM
  How do you feel about Louisville? I ask because it is my understanding -- VTHokie2000 09/07/2016 1:44PM
  I understand the reason the ACC took Louisville.... -- Old Line Hokie 09/07/2016 7:58PM
  I wonder if the B1G and P12 are concerned about UT -- lawhokie 09/07/2016 9:46PM
  How many conferences has Penn State or UNC... -- Old Line Hokie 09/07/2016 11:00PM
  Penn State was barely in the B10 for twenty years -- lawhokie 09/08/2016 09:04AM
  We'll just have to agree that we disagree. ** -- Old Line Hokie 09/08/2016 1:33PM
  Louisville isn't "running the show" in the ACC -- EDGEMAN 09/07/2016 3:27PM
  Now that just about every conference has its own network -- VTHokie2000 09/06/2016 12:40PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307