TechSideline.com

Agree. Nothing's perfect.

You raise a good point. But going with the 5 conference winners removes much of the subjectivity from committee selection at the cost of expanding only by one game. The present P5 schedules feature a measure of OOC equity that could be strengthened if needed.

In response to this post by Pylons

Posted: 12/06/2017 at 11:58PM

Joel Klatt, "the College Football Playoff is borderline corrupt" (LINK) -- Stech 12/06/2017 08:07AM

As long as there are a dirty dozen humans selecting 4, 6,8 it -- anotherdamnyankeehokie 12/07/2017 09:03AM

Re: Joel Klatt, -- SoCloseHokie 12/07/2017 08:05AM

I would go to 6 teams- All 5 conference champions and one from all other -- hokiego 12/06/2017 4:25PM

Sure, but expanding the playoffs is stupid. -- crabcake77 12/06/2017 3:24PM

5 conference champs + wildcard (best available) imo. -- BAMRising 12/06/2017 5:30PM

Guessing the SEC will get 3-4 teams every year with that arrangement -- EDGEMAN 12/06/2017 4:24PM

If you go to just conference champions... -- The_VT_Rock 12/06/2017 1:34PM

Why not add just one game to cover all P5 winners -- gmuhokie 12/06/2017 11:53AM

That makes the actual selection more objective -- Pylons 12/06/2017 12:21PM

Agree. Nothing's perfect. -- gmuhokie 12/06/2017 11:58PM

Re: Joel Klatt, -- Vippie1 12/06/2017 09:28AM

Of course, if you buy into Klatt, expanding to 8 is -- Pylons 12/06/2017 11:36AM

Re: Of course, if you buy into Klatt, expanding to 8 is -- Vippie1 12/06/2017 1:34PM

Agree. Nothing's perfect.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors