All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

Tafkam Hokie

Joined: 10/07/1999 Posts: 35179
Likes: 13640


I heard a bit of a throwaway comment on the radio that got me wondering


They said something to the effect of in the US, soccer is a rich kid sport, while in the rest of the world, it is a poor kid sport.

I wonder if wealth, or even just middle class-ness, removes some of the hunger to excel, to push yourself to the absolute limits of your athletic potential. A middle class kid likely still has an opportunity to go to college even without an athletic scholarship. And once they get there, are probably more likely to prioritize their education over excelling in a sport.

But among poorer kids, I seem to hear a lot of stories about how they put their entire heart and soul into a sport because they perceived it as their only way "out," or at the very least it is their only way to stay away from the gangs, drugs, and other hazards of being young and poor.

Sure, there are plenty of exceptions, but it seems like a majority of professional football, basketball, and baseball rosters are made up of those who didn't have a lot of economic advantages growing up.

Might be complete bunk, might be something to it. But the theory does make me wonder.

(In response to this post by Technocrat)

Posted: 10/11/2017 at 5:11PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Wetzel column on USMNT -- Technocrat 10/11/2017 4:10PM
  +1 for the T & A pull ** -- TomTurkey 10/11/2017 7:48PM
  I think that is a big part of it -- Manbearpig 10/11/2017 5:45PM
  Good post -- Technocrat 10/11/2017 8:00PM
  Yet at the same time ... -- Nova Hokie 95 10/11/2017 4:44PM
  Good read. ** -- Chris Coleman  10/11/2017 4:18PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307