For that to be true, you have to assume nearly all over 65 have UI
Since only 3 without issues vs 750+ with issues died, you'd have to assume that 90% of people over 65 had those issues. Seems a bit of a stretch to me.
The biggest thing missing in this whole thing is the denominator though. One thing I have been looking for but can't find is the age distribution of infections. Do the same factors that make it higher risk lead to higher levels of infection? The confirmed cases would skew that way for sure as the testing is skewed toward those with symptoms and high risk.
|
(
In response to this post by Beerman)
Posted: 04/02/2020 at 3:32PM