We are fortunate that our house happens to have a great view and when the snowbirds are down, we're periodically approached by people who want to buy it. Whether they are offended by the truly ridiculous over market amount they'd have to pay us to get it is not our problem. They may think their interest in buying trumps our interest in not selling, but it doesn't.

Schools that sell their broadcast rights aren't entitled to buy back those rights. If they find the terms to be intolerable, then don't agree to the deal. Did they think it would be less? I actually think they thought it would be more and they aren't happy because it isn't more and that's why they want a new deal.

TX and OU are going to pay whatever the Big 12 Bylaws call for. And barring a sufficient vote to the contrary, the same will happen in the ACC. There is no reason for anything else to occur.

Would love to listen in on the call. "Hey Wake, this is Clemson, we've decided that you have to sell us back our rights for less than what we agreed to pay...yeah, you are also going to get screwed in the future because of it...yeah, that's because we're Clemson and we're entitled. Oh? And the horse I rode in on?"