All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

goldendomer

Joined: 01/04/2001 Posts: 2799
Likes: 1183

What's this?

If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay


But what the ACC gave up to get a average football team, but huge brand was a lot.

ND gave up some too, but I think if we continue to slide this deal will be come a bit of a albatross for the ACC. We will be content to glide along our mediocre way. The games against is will lose importance if we continue carry on this path.
[Post edited by goldendomer at 07/18/2017 08:24AM]

(In response to this post by Stech)

Posted: 07/18/2017 at 08:24AM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- HOO86 07/17/2017 11:48AM
  Re: Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- Millpoint 07/17/2017 3:19PM
  They will wait forever than 20 years after forever. -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 07:49AM
  Re: They will wait forever than 20 years after forever. -- Vippie1 07/18/2017 11:16AM
  Think Domer was referencing the CFP, not ACC -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 12:57PM
  Concur on both sides being happy with the current arrangement -- EDGEMAN 07/18/2017 11:40AM
  Re: Swofford: The ACC membership will in 2036 look a lot like it does today -- Millpoint 07/17/2017 3:17PM
  Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them. -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:21AM
  The status quo works for me just fine -- TerryD 07/18/2017 07:44AM
  ACCdoes not need us now, the ACC made a overall poor deal. -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 07:38AM
  I think both sides made a good deal -- TerryD 07/18/2017 11:53AM
  Two football national Champs in 3 years is pretty good & other ND sports -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:58AM
  If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay -- goldendomer 07/18/2017 08:24AM
  It was a great deal for the ACC - not sure why you disagree -- lawhokie 07/18/2017 9:25PM
  Re: If that is goal sure. Short term it looks okay -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 11:36AM
  We disagree today, we will always disagree on this... -- TerryD 07/18/2017 11:39AM
  Re: We disagree today, we will always disagree on this... -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 1:05PM
  Re: Sorry WADR, not true, may even take someone else before them. -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 07:30AM
  ND would only have to decide path if they had a 12-0 or 11-1 year, -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 1:09PM
  Your logic is right -- RTFC 07/19/2017 1:13PM
  Your second paragraph is most likely ** -- TerryD 07/20/2017 11:17AM
  Re: ND would only have to decide path if they had a 12-0 or 11-1 year, -- SoCloseHokie 07/18/2017 1:47PM
  Swofford may. I don't know that it's a good idea. -- HOO86 07/17/2017 3:20PM
  I'm still waiting for Wake to pay their $25,000 fine. -- Old Line Hokie 07/17/2017 2:25PM
  So no one's coming to the ACC...unless they do. :-) -- Stech 07/17/2017 12:14PM
  Disagree. -- East Cobb Hokie 07/17/2017 2:29PM
  You disagree that Swofford won't say anything until ink is dry? That 's my -- Stech 07/18/2017 07:10AM
  Excuse my futile attempt at humor -- East Cobb Hokie 07/18/2017 1:00PM
  Even when the ink is dry, Swofford may still wait to make -- VTHokie2000 07/18/2017 10:52AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307