All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

The Lounge Board

Hokie CPA

Joined: 10/28/1999 Posts: 79477
Likes: 9047


You're implying the artist has squatters' rights. I don't think so.


Squatters rights attach if the squatters actually occupy the property without a lease agreement or paying rent. I don't think the art itself qualifies as occupying the property. The property owner still had use of the warehouse.

I'll tell you what, though... if I'm a property owner with graffiti on it, I'm washing it off ASAFP before anyone can object to it. I'll assert my property rights from the very first tag to keep something like that from happening.

(In response to this post by 48zip)

Posted: 02/13/2018 at 8:53PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  A diffetent angle. Think "adverse possession". -- 48zip 02/13/2018 8:46PM
  One thing the guy could've done... -- Hokie CPA 02/13/2018 8:33PM
  Yeah, that was a poor decision by the owner... -- MP4VT2004 02/13/2018 3:43PM
  Speaking of Red-cockaded woodpeckers... -- EDGEMAN 02/13/2018 2:30PM
  I say it will be overturned - what defines art ** -- bigbadbird 02/13/2018 2:28PM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307