Conference Realignment Board

Joined: 07/14/1999 Posts: 69946
Likes: 16569

What's this?

Your supposition is correct if talking about a brand new channel.

There is an awful lot of expense in creating a brand new channel and getting carriage on all the cable companies plus Dish and Direct TV for that channel.

If a little used, and non money making current channel (such as ESPNNews) is converted to the ACCN.

The hard labor in starting that channel was done a long time ago. The only hard part that would remain is getting higher carriage fees for those systems in the ACC footprint.

Production facilities would be easy. ESPN already has production facilities in Charlotte, NC for it's SEC Network, plus Raycom already has production facilities in Charlotte now. And I expect Raycom to be neck deep in the ACCN anyway.

Why not take a money losing or at best an underperforming channel, and use it to make more money?

(In response to this post by 33laszlo99)

Posted: 05/05/2016 at 05:28AM

PREV NEXT REPLY

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:

Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:

Current Thread:

So what does it really mean when ESPN loses Mike Tirico, Skip Bayless, and -- CobbCountyHokie 05/04/2016 11:05PM

I don't think it means that much. ESPN has always been notoriously cheap -- marcbvtgm 05/05/2016 11:02PM

ESPN has been losing people the past few years. -- Old Line Hokie 05/05/2016 10:51AM

If UT ever joins the ACC, having ESPN holding -- daveinop 05/05/2016 09:56AM

Ut means what? -- BigCrumpy 05/05/2016 12:09PM

Tejas ** -- daveinop 05/05/2016 1:42PM

Gad I'd have though it was Univ of Tennessee. ** -- BigCrumpy 05/05/2016 3:57PM

The loss of Trico and Nessler may hurt because they did multiple -- VTHokie2000 05/05/2016 09:49AM

Like Tirico, love Nessler -- mancunian 05/05/2016 09:33AM

I think it means they need to spend money to make money and the talent -- ColumbusHokie 05/05/2016 07:05AM

Wasted money -- mrcaniac 05/05/2016 01:27AM

Seems to make sense to repurpose a current channel. -- Atlee Hokie 05/05/2016 05:15AM

ESPN worried about the sizzle, not the steak -- mrcaniac 05/05/2016 11:45AM

Re: So what does it really mean when ESPN loses Mike Tirico, Skip Bayless, and -- 33laszlo99 05/05/2016 01:09AM

I think some of this is spot on, but other parts are too far-fetched, imo -- daveinop 05/05/2016 09:12AM

Re: I think some of this is spot on, but other parts are too far-fetched, imo -- 33laszlo99 05/05/2016 09:53AM

All fair points. I think at least part of the holdup is due to -- daveinop 05/05/2016 10:51AM

Your supposition is correct if talking about a brand new channel. -- Atlee Hokie 05/05/2016 05:28AM

ESPN cost cutting helps the ACC -- HOO86 05/05/2016 12:43AM

I like the thought of the BIG being on Fox and ACC on ESPN.... -- Mr. Touchdown 05/05/2016 10:03AM

I have a slightly different spin -- daveinop 05/05/2016 09:37AM

This is all a bubble IMO. At some point this will not be able to sustain -- corvt2000 05/05/2016 08:58AM

Not so sure about that. ESPN's about the only thing keeping cable subscribe -- chuckd4vt 05/05/2016 2:06PM

"Talent" used loosely when referencing Bayless I assume. ** -- crabcake77 05/04/2016 11:40PM

He has a talent for drawing viewers and generating conversation -- Gator Hokie 05/05/2016 08:33AM

Would concur WRT Skip Bayless. -- Atlee Hokie 05/05/2016 05:36AM

I know a lot of people like Tirico, but to me he is nothing special. ** -- Mr. Touchdown 05/05/2016 09:59AM

Nessler leaving is likely, but not confirmed, yes? -- Roanokie 05/04/2016 11:05PM

Correct. Not yet confirmed but discussed openly by media talking heads. ** -- CobbCountyHokie 05/04/2016 11:06PM

In theory, they could pass on the Big 10 rights to help the bottom line -- Roanokie 05/04/2016 11:20PM

This is why their bid for the Tier I Big 10 rights was "ceremonial" -- CobbCountyHokie 05/04/2016 11:24PM

Your supposition is correct if talking about a brand new channel.

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors