All Hokie, All the Time. Period.

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 1/1/05 Posts: 10560
Likes: 1572


I don't disagree that the schools do see themselves as being


equals. However, they may admit privately that certain schools do carry more weight in certain sports. Whether they want to admit it or not, I do believe at some level they want to make sure each is getting the most bang for their buck which means the ACC is getting the most bang for its buck too. One of the reasons the ACC placed FSU and Da U in opposite divisions is because at the time they were probably the top 2 name brand programs in the ACC (historically speaking). In addition to wanting an all-FL CCG. So at least in that regards the decision makers did care about "name brands." Clemson and VT were probably in that next group. However, it isn't clear whether they were placed in opposite divisions in part because of their name brand status or exclusively on other factors (i.e. protected cross-division pairings, a school's preference, rivalries (i.e. Textile Bowl), etc).

(In response to this post by hokie-c)

Posted: 07/16/2017 at 2:59PM



+0
Current Thread:
 
  
WFNZ in Charlotte is at the ACC meeting -- Victor Tango 07/13/2017 11:07AM
  Pods ** -- daveinop 07/15/2017 08:51AM
  This realignment seems unrealistic. -- hokie-c 07/14/2017 10:09AM
  Re: WFNZ in Charlotte is at the ACC meeting -- Millpoint 07/13/2017 2:52PM
  Like groundhog day. Same topic, new "reporter". ** -- goldendomer 07/13/2017 2:01PM
  If/when UT jouns another conference it -- 133193Hokie 07/13/2017 12:40PM
  Swofford comments -- TerryD 07/13/2017 11:30AM
  More -- TerryD 07/13/2017 12:40PM
  "Unless", you mean....not "until" :) ** -- TerryD 07/13/2017 12:59PM
  Good one. :-) ** -- Stech 07/14/2017 07:11AM

Support TSL by Shopping at Amazon


Our Sponsors







vm311