But they're increasing it slowly but surely. And they aren't sharing profit

Just as the LHN is starting to pick up steam, so is this thing. Meanwhile, crickets out of Greensboro. Had we went this route in 2010, VT would have an additional $5 million already in its pocket along with a nice percentage of built up equity in a nearly billion dollar enterprise. And oh, I wouldn't have been watching games on my cell phone these last few years.

In response to this post by daveinop

Posted: 06/17/2016 at 3:12PM

Larry Scott: "PAC-12N Optimal Model for US" -- HOO86 06/16/2016 5:06PM

Adding 4 Big 12 schools would improve distribution.. -- Old Line Hokie 06/17/2016 11:15AM

I think the PAC12 has a luxury that the ACC doesn't have... -- Mr. Touchdown 06/17/2016 10:46AM

I see it very differently... -- jesuisvtguy 06/18/2016 05:00AM

Tens of millions less people there and college sports are not as relevant. -- chuckd4vt 06/18/2016 01:34AM

Love that model. It's ALREADY worth $800 million. -- chuckd4vt 06/16/2016 10:04PM

Read it again. to make the profit now, they have to sell. to get -- daveinop 06/17/2016 08:03AM

Understand. But they've been doing SOMETHING. Cashing some checks already. -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:05PM

Or you could try to address the conundrum raised by the author -- daveinop 06/17/2016 5:10PM

The take the money now or wait till later question isn't a bad one. ** -- chuckd4vt 06/18/2016 01:31AM

I'm not so bullish on the pac12n model -- ren_hoek 06/17/2016 06:57AM

What are you going to say if the ACCNetwork is nowhere near the SECNetwork? -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:08PM

ESPN owns the ACC's tier 3 content. The Pac 12 kept their tier 3 and a lot -- ChrisLords 06/18/2016 11:40PM

Agree to disagree -- ren_hoek 06/17/2016 4:46PM

Relying to ESPN to force providers to pay for ACCN -- Colonel Jessup 06/18/2016 08:05AM

Even though the Pac-12N model may not be generating as much revenue -- VTHokie2000 06/16/2016 5:56PM

The weakness is they have no leverage in distribution and fees -- daveinop 06/17/2016 08:07AM

But they're increasing it slowly but surely. And they aren't sharing profit -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:12PM

Rinse, repeat** -- daveinop 06/17/2016 5:14PM

Since no one knows what the future will be in terms of distribution -- VTHokie2000 06/17/2016 12:04PM

Larry Scott claims that his way is better. -- HOO86 06/16/2016 8:16PM

But they're increasing it slowly but surely. And they aren't sharing profit

Insert a Link

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors