All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

Tailgate Guru

Joined: 01/05/2001 Posts: 9457
Likes: 3902

What's this?

Relatively, NCAA tourney shares/units were a larger source of revenue then


In other words, football television revenue was not nearly as great then as it is today. The ACC's advantage in 2002-03 would have been that it was relatively small (9 members) and had a relatively large share of NCAA men's basketball tournament units to collect. The Big Ten's revenue would have been competitive because it combined a pretty good bit of basketball revenue with larger football stadium sizes.

When you look at differences between schools, the primary difference would arise from income for bowl revenue. So even though conference revenue for the ACC was driving by NCAA tournament dollars, FSU got the most revenue and UNC the least because the typical process then was to share basketball money but "eat what you kill" with respect to extra revenue from football bowl games.

At least, those are my very strong hunches regarding how to interpret this data.

(In response to this post by Will Stewart)

Posted: 04/10/2017 at 3:59PM


+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


75
Hide This

Current Thread:
 
  2002 Major Conference Revenue, Expenses, and Per-School Distributions... -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:32AM
  Relatively, NCAA tourney shares/units were a larger source of revenue then -- Tailgate Guru 04/10/2017 3:59PM
  Upon further review, though those tax returns say 2002 ... -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 12:21PM
  My conclusion=Swofford blew it big time -- The_Phew 04/10/2017 12:08PM
  Consider the following -- Colonel Jessup 04/10/2017 12:33PM
  Pitt/BC/Cuse selections were tailored for a network that didn't materialize -- The_Phew 04/10/2017 1:09PM
  We may not be at the top now but perhaps we will gain more -- IB4TECH 04/10/2017 12:44PM
  WRT to your point about adding BC, Pitt, and Syracuse, please -- VTHokie2000 04/10/2017 12:41PM
  As in, there is a ironclad plan to start 2(?) years after they join -- Colonel Jessup 04/10/2017 12:59PM
  BC destabilized ACC. Cuse, Pitt, UofL were scrambled additions. -- chuckd4vt 04/10/2017 2:16PM
  WVU was never going to be #12 in 2003 expansion -- Colonel Jessup 04/10/2017 3:36PM
  Re: BC destabilized ACC. Cuse, Pitt, UofL were scrambled additions. -- SoCloseHokie 04/10/2017 2:47PM
  Those 3 schools probably did add stability, but it might be -- VTHokie2000 04/10/2017 1:22PM
  Swoffs further tied us to the old model. Pac12 might be best positioned. ** -- chuckd4vt 04/10/2017 12:15PM
  Thank you. Payouts have been downhill ever since for the ACC. -- chuckd4vt 04/10/2017 12:32PM
  Thank you!.... -- 2hhoop3 04/10/2017 11:42AM
  2002 SEC Tax Return (PDF link) -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:40AM
  2002 Pac 10 Tax Return (PDF link) -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:39AM
  2002 Big Ten Tax Return (PDF link) -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:38AM
  2002 Big East Tax Return (PDF link) -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:38AM
  2002 Big 12 Tax Return (PDF link) -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:37AM
  2002 ACC Tax Return (PDF link) -- Will Stewart  04/10/2017 11:35AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors








vm307